Archive

October 22, 2024

Browsing

Carl explores which index is best…the SP600 (IJR) or Russell 2000 (IWM). He makes a comparison over time and reveals which tends to be the better performer. Which one should you use to analyze what is happening in small-caps?

Carl gives us his market outlook as prices pullback today. Bitcoin is looking particularly bullish and Gold continues to impress. He then goes through all of the Magnificent Seven stocks in the short and intermediate terms.

Erin goes through sector rotation to see where the strength and weakness lies within the market. All sectors were pulling back today and PMOs were starting to see strain.

Carl and Erin both took a look at the Energy sector “under the hood” as well as Technology and Materials.

The pair finish with a look at viewers symbol requests which tended to be heavy on the Healthcare sector.

01:13 DP Signal Tables

04:43 Market Overview

14:33 Magnificent Seven Overview (Short and Intermediate terms)

20:16 SP600 (IJR) versus Russell 2000 (IWM)

23:40 Questions (Gold v. SP500, Energy (XLE), Divergences, MSFT)

30:22 Sector Rotation

40:00 Symbol Requests


Introducing the new Scan Alert System!

Delivered to your email box at the end of the market day. You’ll get the results of our proprietary scans that Erin uses to pick her “Diamonds in the Rough” for the DecisionPoint Diamonds Report. Get all of the results and see which ones you like best! Only $29/month! Or, use our free trial to try it out for two weeks using coupon code: DPTRIAL2. Click HERE to subscribe NOW!



Watch the latest episode of the DecisionPointTrading Room on DP’s YouTube channel here!


Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 Subscribe HERE!


Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin


(c) Copyright 2024 DecisionPoint.com


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.


Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules


Good morning and welcome to this week’s Flight Path. Equities saw the “Go” trend continue this week as the indicator painted strong blue bars the entire week. Treasury bond prices saw the “NoGo” trend continue with a week of strong purple bars. U.S. commodities saw the “Go” trend continue this wek and at the end of the week we saw a new strong blue bar. GoNoGo Trend shows that trend in the U.S. dollar continued to be a “Go” with mostly strong blue bars.

$SPY Remains in “Go” Trend with Price at Highs

The GoNoGo chart below shows that the trend is strong for U.S. equities. GoNoGo Trend paints a week of uninterrupted strong blue bars as price remains elevated and close to highs. GoNoGo Oscillator has fallen from over bought levels and is now at a value of 3. This confirms the trend we see in the price panel.

The longer time frame chart tells us that the trend is still well and truly in place as we see another strong blue “Go” bar at new highs. GoNoGo Oscillator is approaching overbought territory and this represents enthusiasm from the market as we see prices climb higher.

The “Go” Trend Survives Another Week

Treasury bond yields emerged out of the “NoGo” last week and now we see that this week we have been able to maintain the new “Go” trend. The indicator paints strong blue bars and GoNoGo Oscillator is in positive territory at a value of 3.

The Dollar Continues to Show Strength

Last week we saw a Go Countertrend Correction Icon (red arrow) telling us that price may struggle to go higher in the short term. As is sometimes the case in strong trends, price blew right past this warning and we saw strong blue “Go” bars and new highs this week. GoNoGo Oscillator has remained elevated this week as it stays in overbought territory.

How do you track movements of all the S&P 500 stocks on any given trading day? In this video, Dave will show you how he uses the StockCharts MarketCarpet to evaluate broad equity market conditions, assess the changes in the mega-cap stocks which dominate the benchmarks, and identify potential outliers that could serve as investment candidates. Enjoy this mini-masterclass on how to use a powerful heat map to better follow the technical analysis trends!

This video originally premiered on October 21, 2024. Watch on our dedicated David Keller page on StockCharts TV!

Previously recorded videos from Dave are available at this link.

When the market is down, you can see which stocks Wall Street may be pumping money into. So on a Monday morning when the markets are down, this allows you to spot stocks that are bucking the intraday trend.

If you go to your Predefined Scans under Bullish Technical Indicators, you can see which stocks are experiencing sizable inflows. Let’s zero in on the Moved Above Upper Bollinger Band list.

FIGURE 1. PREDEFINED SCAN. We’ll focus on the last row, highlighting the stocks that have moved above the upper Bollinger Band on a day when stocks are largely declining.Image source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Clicking on that selection and arranging the next page by “U” (Universe), the highest large-cap stock with the strongest StockCharts Technical Rank (SCTR) score was Applovin Corp (APP). APP also held the top spot on the Top 10 SCTR Report in the Large Cap, Top 10 category.

FIGURE 2. TOP 10 SCTR STOCKS ON OCTOBER 21, 2024. Applovin occupies the number one position with a 99.9 SCTR score.Image source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

A Little Background on Applovin Corp

Even if you’ve never heard much about Applovin Corp—a tech company specializing in mobile app marketing and monetization solutions—you still will probably recognize the name, as it’s been showing up on the SCTR reports for quite some time.

If you do your research, you’ll find that Wall Street has been exceedingly bullish on this stock for quite some time. You should start with StockCharts’ Symbol Summary; this will give you fundamental and technical info to begin your research. For example, APP’s one-year performance was an impressive +322.7%. But if you’re coming in late to the game and interested in scooping up shares of APP, you’ll have to check the technicals to see where a good entry point might present itself.

Let’s look at a daily chart of APP in light of the Bollinger Bands scan.

Applovin’s Daily Price Action

FIGURE 3. DAILY CHART OF APP. Note the SCTR line over the entire five months (it’s been that high for an even longer period).Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

In the SCTR line and APP’s relative performance against the S&P 500 ($SPX) in the panels above the price chart, note the following:

  • APP’s SCTR line has been largely above 90, indicating exceeding technical strength over multiple timeframes and indicators.
  • If you look at the blue arrow pointing to relative performance, notice how the SCTR line prefigured APP’s superior performance against the S&P 500 long before it began outperforming the index. Although no indicator is a guarantee, the SCTR line is a strong tool for signaling the potential outperformance of a given stock.

Looking at the price chart, as the Predefined Scan pointed out, APP broke above the upper Bollinger Band, which is set to the second standard deviation. Only in rare cases can any stock maintain such a position. Typically, 90% to 95% of a stock’s price movements occur within the Bollinger Bands. There’s a strong chance of a pullback.

However, once a strong trend gets underway, price will often “walk” the Bollinger Bands—on the upside, it tends to “hug” the upper band, and the opposite is true of a strong downtrend.

The September price action illustrates this dynamic. In this case, it was particularly strong as APP’s “walk” took place above the upper band, signifying strong bullishness as the stock price rallied.

In the case that it pulls back

  • Look to the middle Bollinger Band for a potential bounce.
  • If APP’s price falls below the middle band, you will likely find support in the range highlighted by the blue rectangle, as it encompasses a market support level and the area surrounding the lower Bollinger Band.

What does momentum look like?

  • According to the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF), buying pressure looks strong, even though it’s receding slightly.
  • But a volume-based momentum reading from the Money Flow Index, aka MFI (which is like a volume-weighted Relative Strength Index indicator), shows that it was “overbought” and is now receding, forming a bearish divergence which warns of a pullback.

Meanwhile, APP’s SCTR reading remains strongly bullish. So, if you want to enter a position, keep an eye on the potential support levels outlined in the chart (specifically, the dynamic Bollinger Band levels and the market-based support level in the blue rectangle).

If market conditions change, especially if new and unexpected market factors come into play, then a stop loss a few points below $123 might be sufficient enough for you to reassess the situation and readjust your setup for a new entry point.

Tip: Make StockCharts’ Predefined Scans Part of Your Trading Routine

Incorporating Predefined Scans into your market assessment routine is like having a radar showing which stocks are ready to move. You’ll know what to research, and after that, analyze the stock chart to determine when and where to jump in.

The Bottom Line

Using one of many StockCharts tools to scan the market is a smart and efficient way to get an edge in spotting opportunities. This article focused on stocks that bucked the intraday downtrend. Through a few scans, I found APP, which has been on the top of the SCTR list for quite some time. This type of scan routine can help you find other market prospects in the future. Remember: don’t leave opportunities to chance. Scan early and often.


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

As the world continues to embrace digital currencies and blockchain technology, the cryptocurrency industry is solidifying its position on a broad scale as a key part of the global economy.

2024 has been a big year for the crypto sector, with milestones including a new all-time high for Bitcoin and the approval of spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds in the US.

The US election is less than one month away, and the outcome will have far-reaching implications for the crypto market. Issues such as regulation, taxation and the integration of cryptocurrencies into the mainstream economy will be critical in shaping the future of this dynamic sector.

The stakes are high for crypto market participants who want to secure their interests in a rapidly evolving financial landscape. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this burgeoning market has become a major talking point in the US election cycle for crypto-friendly voters pushing for a favorable regulatory framework. The most recent survey data from a Harris Poll conducted on behalf of Grayscale showed that nearly half of likely voters somewhat or strongly agree that crypto, blockchain and automated technologies are the future of finance.

As the crypto narrative continues to intertwine with the US election cycle, the choices made in the voting booth could well determine the trajectory of this transformative technology. The stage is set for a pivotal moment in the crypto industry’s history, and the decisions made in the next few months will echo far into the future of finance.

How is the crypto sector influencing the US election?

While the US election is set to impact the crypto market, the reverse is also true — the industry is already influencing lawmakers at both the federal and state levels as voting day approaches.

In December 2023, in order to gain a toehold in the political sphere, a group of three affiliated super political action committees (PACs) backed by prominent figures in the crypto sphere revealed plans to invest a substantial US$78 million with the aim of supporting crypto-friendly candidates in their political campaigns.

Fairshake, one of the group’s three affiliated super PACs, has now raised upwards of US$200 million through donations from major stakeholders, including significant contributions from the Winklevoss twins and companies such as Kraken, Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) and Electric Capital Partners. The group reportedly spent around US$10 million on attack ads to sway voters against Representative Katie Porter (D) in California’s Senate race in March, which she ultimately lost. The Cedar Innovation Foundation, another super PAC group with unknown backers, reportedly engaged in similar lobbying efforts in January to unseat crypto cynic Senate Banking Chairman Sherrod Brown (D-OH).

Before President Biden withdrew as the Democratic candidate, Republicans were the primary beneficiaries of super PAC support. However, the situation changed almost immediately when Vice President Kamala Harris entered the race, although she remained tight-lipped on the issue for weeks following her nomination.

A new advocacy group, Crypto4Harris — which included billionaire and crypto advocate Mark Cuban and SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci — was quick to throw its support behind Harris, who was perceived as more receptive towards the industry.

At the Democratic National Convention on August 21, an aide to Harris’ team said she would “support policies to expand the industry.” Harris confirmed her position on the issue at a Wall Street fundraiser a month later while emphasizing that consumer protection is an equally paramount part of her “Opportunity Economy” pledge.

At a rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, on October 14, Harris reaffirmed her commitment to supporting the crypto industry, stating that her administration would establish rules for digital assets.

Following this announcement, Chris Larsen, the co-founder of Ripple Labs, donated US$1 million worth of his company’s native tokens XRP to Future Forward, a significant super PAC that’s backing Harris’ run. Ripple Labs has been engaged in a years-long battle with the SEC over sales of XRP. Judge Analisa Torres ruled in Ripple’s favor in August, but the SEC reopened the case by filing a motion to appeal on October 2.

How is crypto currently regulated in the US?

The regulatory landscape for the crypto industry in the US is still evolving, and further developments are expected to occur in the coming years. As it stands, various government agenciesemploy diverse strategies to regulate different aspects of the industry, reflecting their unique mandates and objectives.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the primary regulator of securities in the US and, under Chairman Gary Gensler, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, it has taken the view that many cryptocurrencies constitute securities and are therefore subject to federal securities laws.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is the primary regulator of futures and options contracts in the US. It is of the opinion that certain cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, are commodities due to their decentralized nature and the fact that they are not backed by a government or other central authority.

Both regulators have taken action against crypto exchanges for breaking laws. Most notably, the CFTC brought charges against Binance founder Changpeng Zhao for violating the Commodity Exchange Act in March 2023. Meanwhile, the SEC has been involved in litigation against numerous crypto companies for years.

Majority party split on crypto regulation

Democrats appear divided on the best approach to crypto regulation. While some have cited concerns that overregulation could stifle innovation, other representatives, like Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), have advocated for more stringent policies, citing threats to national security without proper money-laundering provisions in place.

That division became evident when a resolution to overturn the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB-121) passed in the House in early May. The resolution, which requires firms that provide custody for crypto assets to record them as liabilities, was primarily backed by Republicans, who argued it would reduce regulatory burdens, enable crypto innovation and challenge the SEC’s evolving guidance on digital asset custody. Opponents said reversing the order would undermine the SEC’s authority, which put the measure in place to protect consumers and investors from fraud.

Despite Biden’s opposition to the resolution and his promise to veto the decision, 11 Democratic senators crossed party lines to vote in favor, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. His vote to repeal SAB-121 may have been motivated by Republican nominee Donald Trump’s recent support of crypto-friendly policies, which has put pressure on Democrats to reconsider their positions on crypto regulation to avoid losing votes from the crypto crowd.

Biden did ultimately veto SAB-121, but the split among Democrats, as well as the SEC’s recent approval of spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds, and the passing of three crypto-related bills, has led some analysts to suggest that the party may be easing its approach to appease pro-crypto voters and gain the support of the crypto-backed super PACs.

Key US crypto legislation to watch

With cryptocurrencies becoming more mainstream, US lawmakers have been strongly encouraged to create a clear and comprehensive regulatory framework for this rapidly evolving industry.

FIT21 Act

The Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) is the first federal bill specifically focused on cryptocurrencies to pass one chamber of Congress. It provides a comprehensive and clear regulatory framework, giving the CFTC greater regulatory authority for digital assets over the SEC.

Ranking members of the Democratic Party said they would not whip Democrat votes against FIT21 despite the party’s belief that it creates uncertainty and undermines established legal precedents in its current form. FIT21 received “overwhelming bipartisan support” in the House on May 22, passing with a vote of 279 to 136.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was one of the votes in favor of FIT21. When she was speaker, she accepted donations on behalf of the House Majority PAC from ex-crypto king Sam Bankman-Fried before his arrest in 2022. Sources for the American Prospect confirmed she was considering the motion days before the vote took place.

In addition to FIT21, Congressman John Rose (R-TN) introduced the BRIDGE Digital Assets Act to Congress on September 12. This bill seeks to establish a joint advisory committee consisting of members of the SEC and CFTC. It was referred to the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Agriculture. The House’s next session is scheduled for November 12 to 21.

Some lawmakers are urging Congress to hold a Senate vote for FIT21 ahead of the November election, although this has been opposed by the president and the SEC.

Responsible Financial Innovation Act

For opponents, the Responsible Financial Innovation Act offers an alternative approach. The bill was a bipartisan effort that was reintroduced by Senators Cynthia Lummis (R-WYO) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) in July 2023. It has since been referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.

The Act is similar to FIT21; however, there are also some differences between the two bills in terms of their specific provisions and approaches. For example, FIT21 places a greater emphasis on defining key terms and providing exemptions from duplicative regulations, while the Responsible Financial Innovation Act focuses more on consumer protection and combating illicit finance, goals that align with statements made by the White House.

Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act

While the Responsible Financial Innovation Act seeks to provide a comprehensive framework for regulating digital assets, the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act aims to address concerns about money laundering and illicit finance in the digital asset space. The bill has 19 sponsors, including Republicans Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Roger Marshall (R-KS), as well as Warren, a longtime political ally to the current president.

What does Harris think about crypto?

The Democrat’s presidential nominee is Kamala Harris, who is currently serving in the Biden administration as Vice President. This section will discuss Harris’ own positions on crypto alongside those of the Biden administration.

There has been heightened government engagement with the crypto sector under the Biden administration. He has been carefully navigating the crypto industry, aiming to balance innovation and economic growth with consumer protection and regulatory oversight.

In March 2022, Biden signed an executive order outlining a strategy to assess the risks and benefits of cryptocurrencies. It focused on six key areas, including consumer protection, responsible innovation and global competitiveness. The order also addressed the lack of coordination between government agencies by promoting a more unified approach.

Building on this move, the White House released a more detailed framework for responsible digital asset development in September 2022. It expanded upon the key areas identified in the initial executive order and provided further guidance for a coordinated, government-wide approach to managing the risks and harnessing the benefits of digital assets.

It is currently not known whether a Harris administration would enact the crypto policies laid out in Biden’s 2025 budget proposal, which includes measures that prevent investors from immediately selling and repurchasing digital assets, as well as one that would require more traditional reporting methods for digital asset transactions. The budget also includes an excise tax on electricity used to mine cryptocurrencies, which is expected to generate US$10 billion in revenue in 2025 and over US$42 billion over 10 years.

As discussed earlier, the Democratic Party struggled to maintain a unified approach to cryptocurrencies under the Biden administration.

However, crypto Dems have some reasons to be hopeful of a moderate approach under Harris. Harris has ties to the tech industry going back to her time as an Attorney General in California in the 2010s, where she was influential in facilitating an agreement on privacy policies.

In early August, Harris was also publicly backed by crypto platform Uphold board member JP Thieriot, and she has reportedly been meeting with industry officials in the weeks leading up to the August 14 online “townhall” event of crypto Democrats, Crypto4Harris, which does not have ties to the official campaign.

Since then, Harris has shown support for the cryptocurrency industry at multiple events.

What does Trump think about crypto?

In response to the crypto industry’s growing influence in the political sphere, Trump also appears to have shifted toward a supportive stance in recent months. After initial skepticism, his forays into the crypto world include the launch of his second collection of Trump Cards, a non-fungible token (NFT) collection on the Polygon blockchain.

In May, Trump became the first presidential nominee to accept donations in digital currencies, and in June, he advocated on Truth Social for all future Bitcoin mining to be done in the US.

Also in May, Lee Bratcher, founder and president of the Texas Blockchain Council, shared insights with Coindesk on Trump’s interest in crypto, suggesting he may have been influenced by former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, who was supportive of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology during his brief campaign.

“Trump looks to Vivek on tech and digital asset policy,” Bratcher said. “When he saw how Vivek captured the Republican voter — and more centrist (voters) than Trump can capture — he’s probably more interested in that (policy).’

Trump appears to be driven by a desire to distinguish himself from political opponents who favor a more active regulatory approach, as well as crypto’s increasing popularity and potential.

In May, he criticized Biden, the Democratic party and Gensler at a dinner for buyers of his NFT cards, telling pro-crypto attendees that they “better vote for Trump” if they want crypto in “any form.”

While he hasn’t explicitly said how he plans to tax digital assets, Trump is a prominent proponent of lower taxes. His administration signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into law in 2017, the largest tax code change made in decades. Provisions within the act are set to expire in 2025, although Trump has said he will make them permanent if he is re-elected. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that if they become permanent, these tax cuts would deduct billions from the US revenue base annually beginning in 2027.

At a rally in New Jersey in mid-May, Trump promised voters that he would impose further tax cuts, lowering the maximum capital gains tax rate from 20 percent to 15 percent. This would affect crypto assets, as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats cryptocurrencies as property, making transactions subject to capital gains and other taxes.

According to Section 1031 of the tax code, some capital gains taxes can be deferred for like-kind exchanges — in other words, investments that are of the same nature or character, even if they differ in size or value. The IRS concluded in 2021 that only “real property” can qualify for tax deference as like-kind exchanges, excluding swaps of cryptocurrency. However, some attorneys disagree with that classification.

Trump spoke at the 2024 Bitcoin Conference in Nashville on July 27, promising friendly regulations and the creation of a strategic Bitcoin stockpile for the US. A draft of legislation to support a Bitcoin reserve was introduced by Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wy) at the event following Trump’s speech. The draft legislation for the reserve fund briefly mentions that it would contribute to reducing the US national debt, but it lacks specific details on how this would be achieved. Trump was notably tight-lipped on the issue during a recent interview with Elon Musk.

It’s worth noting that a special-interest group called Project 2025 has developed a 900 page conservative policy agenda called the Mandate for Leadership that includes strategies to shift the power of the IRS and other agencies toward the executive branch. Additionally, the document recommends that the SEC and the CFTC collaborate to delineate the distinction between digital assets that are classified as securities and those that are considered commodities.

The group was organized by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that has influenced Republican policies in the past, including during Trump’s presidency.

Investor takeaway

Trump’s statements in recent months suggest a permissive stance toward crypto if he is elected. A Harris administration could be more open and forward-thinking than the cautious approach taken by the current Biden administration, but will likely prioritize careful decision-making.

Most crypto experts advocate for a regulated approach, arguing that increased regulatory efforts have served as an incentive for more serious investors. Ultimately, the outcome of the election will have important implications for the future of crypto regulation and the broader crypto industry.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Will First Majestic Silver CEO’s silver price prediction of more than US$100 per ounce come true?

The silver spot price made waves in 2020 when it rose above US$20 per ounce for the first time in four years, and the precious metal has repeatedly tested US$30 per ounce since.

Most recently, the silver price broke through the US$30 mark on May 17 and went on reach a nearly 12-year high of US$31.80 in the next trading session. On May 19, the silver price hit US$32.33 per ounce, which remains its highest point for the year as of September 11.

Well-known figure Keith Neumeyer, CEO of First Majestic Silver (TSX:FR,NYSE:AG), has frequently said he believes the white metal could climb even further, to hit the US$100 mark or even reach as high as US$130 per ounce.

Neumeyer has voiced this opinion often in recent years. He put up a US$130 price target in a November 2017 interview with Palisade Radio, and he also discussed it in an August 2022 interview with Wall Street Silver. He has reiterated his triple-digit silver price forecast in multiple interviews with Kitco over the years, as recently as March 2023.

So far this year, Neumeyer has made his US$100 call in a conversation with ITM Trading’s Daniela Cambone at the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) convention; and in April he acknowledged his reputation as the ‘triple-digit silver guy’ on the Todd Ault Podcast.

He believes silver could hit US$100 due to a variety of factors, including its consistent deficit, its industrial demand and how undervalued it is compared to gold.

At times he’s been even bolder, suggesting in 2016 that silver could reach US$1,000 if gold were to hit US$10,000. More recently, his expected timeline for US$100 silver has been pushed back, but he remains very bullish on the metal in the long term.

In order to better understand where Neumeyer’s opinion comes from and whether a triple-digit silver price is really in the cards, it’s important to take a look at the factors that affect the metal’s movements, as well as where prices have been in the past and where other industry insiders think silver could be headed. First, let’s dive a little deeper into Neumeyer’s US$100 prediction.

Why is Neumeyer calling for a US$100 silver price?

There’s a significant distance for silver to go before it reaches the success Neumeyer has boldly predicted. In fact, in order for the precious metal to jump to the US$100 mark, its price would have to increase from its current value by around 350 percent.

Neumeyer has previously stated that he expects a triple-digit silver price in part because he believed the market cycle could be compared to the year 2000, when investors were sailing high on the dot-com bubble and the mining sector was down. He thinks it’s only a matter of time before the market corrects, like it did in 2001 and 2002, and commodities see a big rebound in pricing. It was during 2000 that Neumeyer himself invested heavily in mining stocks and came out on top.

“I’ve been calling for triple-digit silver for a few years now, and I’m more enthused now,” Neumeyer said at an event in January 2020, noting that there are multiple factors behind his reasoning. “But I’m cautiously enthused because, you know, I thought it would have happened sooner than it currently is happening.”

In his August 2022 with Wall Street Silver, he reiterated his support for triple-digit silver and said he’s fortunately not alone in this optimistic view — in fact, he’s been surpassed in that optimism. ‘I actually saw someone the other day call for US$500 silver,’ he said. ‘I’m not quite sure I’m at the level. Give me US$50 first and we’ll see what happens after that.’

Another factor driving Neumeyer’s position is his belief that the silver market is in a deficit. In a May 2021 interview, when presented with supply-side data from the Silver Institute indicating the biggest surplus in silver market history, Neumeyer was blunt in his skepticism. “I think these numbers are made up,” he said. “I wouldn’t trust them at all.”

He pointed out that subtracting net investments in silver exchange-traded products leaves the market in a deficit, and also questioned the methodology behind the institute’s recycling data given that most recycled silver metal comes from privately owned smelters and refineries that typically don’t make those figures public.

‘I’m guessing the mining sector produced something in the order of 800, maybe 825 million ounces in 2022,’ Neumeyer said when giving a Q4 2022 overview for his company. ‘Consumption numbers look like they’re somewhere between 1.2 and 1.4 billion ounces. That’s due to all the great technologies, all the newfangled gadgets that we’re consuming. Electric vehicles, solar panels, windmills, you name it. All these technologies require silver … that’s a pretty big (supply) deficit.’

In a December 2023 interview with Kitco, Neumeyer stressed that silver is more than just a poor man’s gold and he spoke to silver’s important role in electric vehicles and solar cells.

In line with its view on silver, First Majestic is a member of a consortium of silver producers that in January 2024 sent a letter to the Canadian government urging that silver be recognized as a critical mineral. Silver’s inclusion on the list would allow silver producers to accelerate the development of strategic projects with financial and administrative assistance from the Canadian government. Canada’s critical minerals list is expected to get an update in the summer of 2024.

In his 2024 PDAC interview, Neumeyer once again highlighted this sizable imbalance in the silver’s supply-demand picture. “We’re six years into this deficit. The deficit in 2024 looks like it’s gonna be bigger than 2023, and why is that? Because miners aren’t producing enough silver for the needs of the human race,” he said.

More controversially, Neumeyer is of the opinion that the white metal will eventually become uncoupled from its sister metal gold, and should be seen as a strategic metal due to its necessity in many everyday appliances, from computers to electronics, as well as the technologies mentioned above. He has also stated that silver production has gone down in recent years, meaning that contrary to popular belief, he believes the metal is actually a rare commodity.

Neumeyer’s March 2023 triple-digit silver call is a long-term call, and he explained that while he believes gold will break US$3,000 this year, he thinks silver will only reach US$30 in 2023. However, once the gold/silver ratio is that unbalanced, he believes that silver will begin to take off, and it will just need a catalyst.

‘It could be Elon Musk taking a position in the silver space,’ Neumeyer said. ‘There’s going to be a catalyst at some time, and headlines in the Wall Street Journal might talk about the silver supply deficit … I don’t know what the catalyst will be, but investors and institutions will wake up to the fundamentals of the metal, and that’s when it will start to move.’

In an August 2023 interview with SilverNews, Neumeyer discussed his belief that banks are holding the silver market down. He pointed to the paper market for the metal, which he said the banks have capped at US$30 even in times of high buying.

‘If you want to go and buy 100 billion ounces of silver (in the paper market), you might not even move the price because some bank just writes you a contract that says (you own that),’ he explained, saying banks are willing to get short, because once the buying stops, they push the price down to get the investors out of the market and buy the silver back. ‘… If the miners started pulling their metal out of the current system, then all of a sudden the banks wouldn’t know if they’re going to get the metal or not, so they wouldn’t be taking the same risks they’re taking today in the paper markets.’

The month after the interview, his company First Majestic launched its own 100 percent owned and operated minting facility, named First Mint.

In 2024, gold has seen a resurgence in investor attention as the potential for Fed rate cuts nears closer. In his interview with Cambone at PDAC 2024, Neumeyer countered that perception, stating, “There’s a rush into gold because of the de-dollarization of the world. It has nothing to do with the interest rates.”

What factors affect the silver price?

In order to glean a better understanding of the precious metal’s chances of trading around the US$100 range, it’s important to examine the elements that could push it to that level or pull it further away.

The strength of the US dollar and US Federal Reserve interest rate changes are factors that will continue to affect the precious metal, as are geopolitical issues and supply and demand dynamics. Although Neumeyer believes that the ties that bind silver to gold need to be broken, the reality is that most of the same factors that shape the price of gold also move silver.

For that reason, it’s helpful to look at gold price drivers when trying to understand silver’s price action. Silver is, of course, the more volatile of the two precious metals, but nevertheless it often trades in relative tandem with gold.

Looking first at the Fed and interest rates, it’s useful to understand that higher rates are generally negative for gold and silver, while lower rates tend to be positive. That’s because when rates are higher interest shifts to products that can accrue interest.

When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, the Fed cut rates down to zero from 1 to 1.25 percent. However, rising inflation has led the Fed and other central banks to hike rates, which has negatively impacted gold and silver. In February 2023, the Fed raised rates by just 25 basis points, the smallest hike since March 2022, as Chair Jerome Powell said the process of disinflation has begun. The Fed continued these small rate hikes over the next year with the last in July 2023.

In this latest upward cycle of the silver market, Fed interest rate moves are playing an oversized role in pumping up silver prices. In early July, as analysts factored in the rising potential for interest rate cuts in the remainder of 2024, silver prices were once again testing May’s nearly 12-year high, and they topped US$31 in September in the days leading up to the anticipated first rate cut.

While central bank actions are important for gold, and by extension silver, another key price driver lately has been geopolitical uncertainty. The past few years have been filled with major geopolitical events such as tensions between the US and other countries such as North Korea, China and Iran. More recently, the huge economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s war with Ukraine, the banking crisis in early 2023 and rising tensions in the Middle East brought about by the Israel-Hamas war have been sources of concern for investors.

On a separate note, there is also a strong case to made for the metal’s industrial potential. Higher industrial demand from emerging sectors due to factors like the transition to renewable energy and the emergence of AI technology will be highly supportive for the metal over the next few years. Solar panels are an especially exciting sector as manufacturers have found increasing the silver content increases energy efficiency.

Could silver hit $100 per ounce?

While we can’t know if we’ll reach a $100 per ounce silver price in the near future, there is support for Neumeyer’s belief that the metal is undervalued and that “ideal conditions are present for silver prices to rise.”

Many are on board with Neumeyer in the idea that silver’s prospects are bright, including Peter Krauth of Silver Stock Investor, who believes that ‘we are very likely going to experience the greatest silver bull market of our generation.’

So, if the silver price does rise further, how high will it go?

Let’s look at silver’s recent history. The highest price for silver was just under US$50 in the 1970s, and it came close to that level again in 2011. The commodity’s price uptick came on the back of very strong silver investment demand.

After spending the latter half of the 2010s in the teens, the 2020s have seen silver largely hold above US$20. In August 2020, the price of silver reached nearly US$28.50 before pulling back again, and moved back up near those heights in February 2021. The price of silver saw a 2022 high point of US$26.46 in February, and passed US$26 again in both May and November 2023.

Silver rallied in the later part of the first quarter of 2024, and by April 12 was once again flirting with the US$30 mark as it reached an 11 year high of US$29.26. Despite a brief pull back to the US$26 level, the month of May saw the silver price take another run at US$30, this time successfully pushing into US$32 territory on May 19. Silver prices have experienced volatility for much of the third quarter, ranging from a high of US$31.39 on July 11 to a low of US$26.64 on August 7. As of September 11, silver prices are managing to hold above the US$28 range.

Despite the Fed’s upcoming course reversal on interest rates, the white metal is being weighed down by expectations of a looming recession for both the US and the other economic heavyweight on the block China, according to Trading Economics.

Analyst firm Metals Focus has pointed out that the silver market is expected to post a substantial deficit in 2024 of 215.3 million ounces, the second highest in over 20 years.

What do other experts think about US$100 silver?

Many experts in the space expect silver to perform strongly in the years to come, but don’t necessarily see it reaching US$100 or more, especially given the current macroeconomic conditions.

‘As I was doing my research, and this goes back over several years already, I would get to that US$300 forecast for an ultimate high in the silver price in different ways,’ he said, and broke down what a low gold/silver ratio — like we’ve seen the previous times that silver has peaked — could mean for the metal’s price in the future.

“One of the most significant (events) for me was when we saw almost the entire US Treasury yield curve peak above 5 percent in mid-October,’ he said. ‘Since then, we’ve had the US Dollar Index peak at 107. Both of these have fallen considerably since, I believe in the market’s view that the Fed has stopped hiking rates, with the expectation that rate cuts will come sometime in 2024.’

Breaking through the historic US$50 ceiling will likely happen in quick, sharp daily spikes in the modern AI trading environment, he said, and it could potentially be ‘the first step’ toward even higher silver prices, including $100 silver. ‘The key is that people really fully understand and appreciate the actual (supply) deficit of silver,’ Lin noted.

FAQs for silver

What is the silver price outlook after $30 in 2024?

In 2024, the silver price has finally broken through the long anticipated US$30 mark, a catalyst experts have discussed heavily in recent years.

‘What do I expect for the rest of 2024? I’m going to be conservative … I’m going to say I think we’ll still be in the US$30s — probably in the mid-US$30s,’ he said. ‘I don’t really think silver is going to be in the US$40s by the end of the year. People make arguments that it’ll be US$50, and it could be. But I’m going to remain conservative.’

‘Once silver gets above US$33 and it stays there for three or four days — or better yet, even two or three weeks — there’s not much holding it back to hit US$50 again,’ he said at the time.

While silver didn’t cross that mark in 2022, Morgan shared concerns about what would happen once it did in his forecast for 2023. ‘Last time we got near US$30, very close to it, Rostin Behnam of the (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) came out and said they had to tamp down the silver market. What kind of a free market is that?’

Gareth Soloway, chief market strategist at VerifiedInvesting.com, is another analyst who was confident silver had the potential to break the US$30 per ounce level and move higher in 2024.

Can silver hit $1,000 per ounce?

In 2016, Neumeyer predicted that silver could hit $1,000 per ounce if gold ever climbed to US$10,000 per ounce. This is related to the gold to silver production ratio discussed above, which at the time of the prediction was around 1 ounce of gold to 9 ounces of silver and last year was about 1:8.3.

If silver was priced according to production ratio today, when gold is at US$2,000 silver would be around US$240, or US$222 at 1:9. However, the gold to silver pricing ratio has actually sat around 1:80 to 1:90 recently, and when gold moved above US$2,400 in May 2024, silver was around US$32. Additionally, even if pricing did change drastically to reflect production rates, gold would need to climb by more than 300 percent from its current price to hit the US$10,000 Neumeyer mentioned back in 2016.

As things are now, it seems unlikely silver will reach those highs.

Why is silver so cheap?

The primary reason that silver is sold at a significant discount to gold is supply and demand, with more silver being mined annually.

There is an abundance of silver — according to the US Geological Survey, to date 1,740,000 metric tons (MT) of silver have been discovered, while only 244,000 MT of gold have been found, a ratio of about 1 ounce of gold to 7.1 ounces of silver. In terms of output, 26,000 MT of silver were mined in 2023 compared to 3,000 MT for gold. Looking at these numbers, that puts gold and silver production at about a 1:8.7 ratio last year, while the price ratio on September 17, 2024, was around 1:84 — a huge disparity.

While silver does have both investment and industrial demand, the global focus on gold as an investment vehicle, including countries stockpiling gold, can overshadow silver. Additionally, jewelry alone is a massive force for gold demand.

Is silver really undervalued?

Many experts believe that silver is undervalued at under US$30 compared to fellow currency metal gold. As discussed, their production and price ratios are currently incredibly disparate. While investment demand is higher for gold, silver has seen increasing time in the limelight in recent years, including a 2021 silver squeeze that saw new entrants to the market join in.

Another factor that lends more intrinsic value to silver is that it’s an industrial metal as well as a precious metal. It has applications in technology and batteries — both growing sectors that will drive demand higher.

Silver’s two sides has been on display in recent years: Silver demand hit record highs in 2022, according to the Silver Institute, with physical silver investment rising by 22 percent and industrial by 5 percent over 2021. For 2023, industrial demand was up 11 percent over the previous year, compared to 28 percent decline in physical silver investment.

Is silver better than gold?

There are merits for both metals, especially as part of a well-balanced portfolio. As many analysts point out, silver has been known to outperform its sister metal gold during times of economic prosperity and expansion.

On the other hand, during economic uncertainty silver values are impacted by declines in fabrication demand.

Silver’s duality as a precious and industrial metal also provides price support. As a report from the CPM Group notes, “it can be seen that silver in fact almost always (but not always) out-performs gold during a gold bull market.”

At what price did Warren Buffet buy silver?

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,NYSE:BRK.B) bought up 37 percent of global silver supply between 1997 and 2006. Silver ranged from US$4 to US$10 during that period.

In fact, between July 1997 and January 1998 alone, the company bought about 129 million ounces of the metal, much of which was for under US$5. Adjusted for inflation, the company’s purchases in that window cost about US$8.50 to US$11.50.

How to invest in silver?

There are a variety of ways to get into the silver market. For example, investors may choose to put their money into silver-focused stocks by buying shares of companies focused on silver mining and exploration. As a by-product metal, investors can also gain exposure to silver through some gold companies.

There are also silver exchange-traded funds that give broad exposure to silver companies and the metal itself, while more experienced traders may be interested in silver futures. And of course, for those who prefer a more tangible investment, purchasing physical bullion in silver bar and silver coin form is also an option.

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Meteoric Resources NL (ASX: MEI) (Meteoric or the Company) encloses a replacement ASX release relating to the updated Caldeira Scoping Study released today. The updated announcement corrects Figures 2 – 7 that data had formatting issues.

Meteoric Resources NL (ASX: MEI) (Meteoric or the Company) is pleased to announce an update to the Scoping Study (Study) results on its Caldeira Rare Earth Ionic Clay Project (Caldeira Project or the Project) (see ASX release on 8 July 2024) following the updated Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for the Figueira deposit (see ASX release on 5 August 2024).

The financial metrics of the Project have improved with the inclusion of the high-grade Figueira resources into the Study’s 20-year mine plan increasing NdPr production and reducing operating costs. In addition, rare earth element (REE) spot prices have been adjusted, to include the current pricing (NdPr US$60/kg). All other variables contained in the Study remain in line with previous Scoping Study.

HIGHLIGHTS

Significantly improved financial outcomes throughout the Life of Mine (LOM)

Improved project economics based on a 20-year LOM, maintaining Adamas pricing forecasts (discounted by 40%) highlight the robust nature of the Caldeira Project and deliver:Increase in Pre-tax NPV8% of 14% to US$1,403MPre-tax IRR increases 6% to 40.4%Pre-tax payback of 2.2 yearsNdPr C1 Cash Cost (Opex)1 reduces by 4% to average US$16.84/kg over the first five years and US$20.41/kg LOMAt current spot prices the Calderia Project generates an IRR of 22% with a payback of 3 years.

Improved production profile with the inclusion of high-grade tonnes from Figueira

NdPr production increases by 4% to 18,109 tonnes in first five years with LOM increasing by 7% to 63,899 tonnesTotal REO production increases by 3% to 57,258 tonnes in the first five years and 7% to 193,584 tonnes LOMProject Opex reduces by 3% to an industry leading US$6.74/kg of recovered TREO in a Mixed Rare Earths Carbonate (MREC) over a 20-year LOMAnnualised production of 11.5kt TREO over first five years with LOM average production of 9.7kt TREO comprised of 33% NdPr and 1% DyTbHigher confidence in the mine schedule which is now based 100% on Measured and Indicated Resources for the LOM

Outstanding project growth potential

Extension of the currently modelled 20-year mine life is highly likely based on the current global resource estimate of 740Mt @ 2,572ppm TREO of which only 13.5% is included in the Study mine scheduleStrong scope for the expansion of future processing capacity as additional Mineral Resources are identified through further exploration successSignificant upside potential for additional high-grade mineralisation (>4,000ppm TREO) early in the LOM with 90% of project licences yet to be explored and assessed

Pre-Feasibility Study on track for completion in the second half of FY2025

Meteoric Chief Executive Officer, Nick Holthouse said,

“As expected, the addition of Figueira tonnes has further improved the financial metrics of an already outstanding low cost REE development project.

The simple combination of outstanding metallurgical recoveries and additional high-grade feed from the recently announced Figueira resource cements the Caldeira Project as a low cost, environmentally friendly producer of significance for REEs to a growing supply chain of downstream industries and OEMs.

All key work programs for the Pre-Feasibility Study, including Permitting, Engineering, and Metallurgical and Resource development continue to advance on schedule. This also Includes the recently approved scoping study level separation test work with ANSTO, important to our longer term ambitions of moving further downstream beyond Mixed Rare Earth Carbonates and into separated Rare Earth products.”

Click here for the full ASX Release

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Lithium carbonate values saw further declines in the third quarter, starting the 90 day session at US$12,999 per metric ton and shedding 22 percent by September 10, hitting a three year low of US$10,019.

Despite the contraction, market watchers and analysts are viewing Q3 as a price stabilization period for lithium, noting that the battery metal, which was previously in free fall, likely bottomed out in September.

This theory has been reinforced by an upward trend in prices during the first weeks of the fourth quarter.

Some of Q3’s price stability came as lithium producers scaled back output and expenditures to counter slower demand growth, particularly from the electric vehicle (EV) sector, which is the primary driver of lithium demand.

Their response also benefited other segments of the lithium market.

“Prices for lithium carbonate in China remained at a premium to hydroxide in a reflection of the growing regional preference for LFP cathode chemistries over high-nickel NCM. However, this gap remained narrow.”

While chemical prices remained close to equal, spodumene prices fell. Jang said this was a delayed response to the decline in chemical prices, as most spodumene pricing contracts reference the chemical spot market.

The decrease in spodumene prices was also mentioned in a July price assessment from S&P Global Commodity Insights. It notes that spodumene has registered a steep price decline since peaking during Q4 2022.

According to Platts data, spodumene with 6 percent lithium oxide content was assessed at US$950 per metric ton on July 15, FOB Australia basis. That’s down US$7,250, or 88 percent, from its peak on November 18, 2022.

Lithium supply and demand trends in Q3

Market oversupply, subdued spot market activity and a shift in preferred battery chemistries emerged as the most prevalent trends impacting the lithium market between July and the end of September.

“Q3 has been a quiet quarter on the spot market. The majority of demand from midstream consumers of lithium chemicals was satisfied by volumes delivered under contract,” Jang commented. “Cathode producers secured limited extra material on the spot market, adjusting this according to their demand.”

Prices also faced headwinds from a supply imbalance. “Inventories of chemicals in China remained high, which did not support prices. Several lithium producers, especially those higher up the cost curve that were producing from hard rock, reduced or stopped production due to the deteriorating price environment,” she added.

On the battery side, the once-dominant NCM chemistry lost some of its market share to the lithium-rich LFP design.

“LFP demand growth proved stronger than NCM, resulting in increased LFP production, with some cathode producers undertaking the approximately nine month process of switching a portion of their capacity from NCM to LFP,” said Jang.

EV sales climb as market recovers

Although US EV sales figures for 2024 have come in below projections, the broader EV sector made large gains in September when global sales tallies topped 1.7 million units, setting a new monthly record.

According to data from Rho Motion, the banner month for EV sales represents a 22 percent year-to-date increase. Regionally, the Chinese market saw the most significant increase, with 1.1 million new EVs sold.

“This record-breaking month of EV sales brings new hope to the industry,” said Charles Lester, data manager at Rho Motion, in a mid-October article. He went on to note, “While the electrification of transport seems inevitable, the recent slowdown of sales in many parts of the world has sewn seeds of doubt which can now start to be swept aside. However, the regional disparities are astonishing, with China alone accounting for well over half the global total, meanwhile Europe’s numbers are shrinking, and the US and Canada are steadily growing.”

Another end-use segment that saw demand growth in Q3 was the energy storage system (ESS) sector. Jang noted that it grew steadily even as downstream EV sales growth continued to vary widely between different regions.

‘We saw this particularly in North America, where it triggered ESS market participants to secure carbonate ahead of the presidential election in November, fearing tariff increases following either election result,” she said.

Tariffs incentivizing North American EV production

As the third largest producer of lithium and the leader in battery and EV manufacturing, China’s dominance in these markets has led the US, EU and Canada to implement steep tariffs on Chinese EVs.

Most recently, Canada levied a 100 percent tariff on EV imports from the country, citing “unfair” trade policies. China responded quickly by filing a complaint with the World Trade Organization over the 100 percent EV tariffs, as well as Canada’s 25 percent tariffs on aluminum and steel products from the Asian nation.

Although the EV tariffs are meant to protect Canadian automakers and the sector, they do little to address the nation’s supremacy in battery manufacturing, nor do they incentivize regional lithium production.

“Tariffs on raw material imports are likely to be more impactful in spurring regional lithium production than tariffs on EV imports. But domestic automakers tend not to be too fond of this as it raises their cost of production. Domestic automakers are more interested in EV import tariffs of course, but the impact of this on regional lithium production is less direct,’ noted Adam Megginson, an analyst at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence

In the US, tariffs on Chinese lithium-ion batteries for EVs are set to jump from 7.5 percent to 25 percent in 2025, while tariffs on EV imports will climb to 100 percent. However, even as the Biden administration hikes taxes on Chinese EVs, it is offering help to the domestic auto sector.

“We have seen strong funding support at the federal level, with a second round of grants from the US Department of Energy unveiled targeted at battery raw materials projects,” said Megginson.

The analyst went on to note that SWA Lithium, a joint venture company owned by Canada’s Standard Lithium (TSXV:SLI,NYSEAMERICAN:SLI) and Norwegian energy company Equinor (NYSE:EQNR), received a US$225 million grant from the US for the construction of Phase 1 of the South West Arkansas project.

The Department of Energy’s Office of Manufacturing and Energy Supply Chains, which oversees the funding, also awarded a grant to another US-based company. “American lithium project developer TerraVolta was selected by the (Department of Energy) to receive a US$225 million grant for its Liberty Owl project, located in Texarkana, Texas. TerraVolta plans to commence construction in 2028, with production the following year,” said Megginson.

Lithium projects in the pipeline

Although the lithium market remained depressed and well supplied during the third quarter, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence is forecasting a supply shortage starting as early as 2025.

While there are currently 101 lithium mines globally, future supply may struggle to meet growing demand, particularly with China expected to drive a 20 percent annual increase over the next decade.

Low lithium prices have already led to reduced project investments and capital expenditures. However, as Jang pointed out, several significant investments in future supply were made during the third quarter.

“In July 2024, European Lithium (ASX:EUR,OTCQB:EUEMF) and Obeikan Group signed a 50/50 joint venture agreement to jointly develop the construction and operation of a lithium hydroxide facility in Saudi Arabia,” she said.

The Benchmark Mineral Intelligence analyst also noted that the EU signed a framework agreement on critical raw materials supply with the Republic of Serbia in July.

Of course, there were also challenges in the quarter. July saw Rio Tinto’s(ASX:RIO,NYSE:RIO,LSE:RIO) plans to advance the Jadar lithium project in Serbia met with opposition. Protestors were demanding that the country’s government revoke permission for the proposed mine and implement a lithium-mining ban.

An October 7 parliamentary vote in Serbia failed to enact such a ban.

Jang also outlined other notable development news from the quarter, including Ganfeng Lithium’s (OTC Pink:GENF,SZSE:002460,HKEX:1772) August investment in Lithium Argentina’s (TSXV:LIT,OTCQX:LILIF,FSE:OAY3) Pastos Grandes lithium brine project in Salta, Argentina, marking a significant expansion in its South American operations.

Also in August, E3 Lithium (TSXV:ETL,OTCQX:EEMMF) entered a joint development agreement with Pure Lithium to explore the design of a lithium metal anode and battery pilot plant in Alberta, Canada.

“In September 2024, Ganfeng Lithium announced a RMB 500 million (US$70.5 million) investment to boost cathode production at its mica mine and processing project in Inner Mongolia,” she said.

“Additionally, SQM Australia (NYSE:SQM) partnered with Andrada Mining (LSE:ATM,OTCQB:ATMTF) in September to jointly develop the Lithium Ridge asset in Namibia.”

Continuing this trend, Rio Tinto announced plans to spend US$6.7 billion to acquire US-based Arcadium Lithium (NYSE:ALTM,ASX:LTM) in early October.

Lithium trends to watch as 2024 continues

If the lithium market has indeed bottomed, there may be opportunities for those with the right risk appetite.

According to a late July report from Sprott, while the long-term outlook for lithium miners remains positive due to rising demand, many producers have experienced significant share price drops throughout 2024.

The firm believes that given lithium’s demand outlook, these stocks could be well positioned for future growth. For investors, this could mean a chance to invest in lithium miners at lower prices compared to 2023.

On a different note, Megginson encouraged investors to watch the US election moving forward.

‘All eyes will be on the US election to see whether a Trump presidency brings about significant structural changes to the (Inflation Reduction Act), or a Harris presidency strengthens this policy support picture,’ he said.

‘We typically expect demand for lithium chemicals to be highest heading into Q4, as it tends to be the strongest quarter for EV sales. Given that feedstock supply upstream remains fairly strong, and chemicals supply in the midstream remains robust, we may not see much movement in prices to the end of the year,’ added Megginson.

Looking ahead to 2025, the analyst said he expects to see more market consolidation if prices remain rangebound. This could also lead to companies looking for merger and acquisition opportunities.

“In 2025, it will be interesting to see which projects are forced to pause or halt production due to the price level challenging their economics,” he said. “Lastly, we will be watching lithium project developments in Africa closely, as several companies are actively developing capacity in the continent, particularly in Zimbabwe and Namibia.’

Megginson added, “Should this new hard-rock supply come online, and at a sufficient grade quality and consistency, it could pose a challenge to incumbent producers who sit higher up on the cost curve.”

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Group Eleven Resources Corp. (TSXV: ZNG) (OTCBB: GRLVF) (FSE: 3GE) (‘Group Eleven’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce results from a recent step-out hole of the 2024 drill program at the Company’s 100%-owned Ballywire zinc-lead-silver discovery (‘Ballywire’), PG West Project (‘PG West’), Republic of Ireland.

Highlights:

G11-3552-18 (a 50m step-out to the NNW from G11-3552-16) intersected:36.6m of 6.4% Zn+Pb (4.8% Zn and 1.6% Pb) and 26 g/t Ag (starting from 226.9m downhole) including:11.8m of 11.6% Zn+Pb (8.0% Zn and 3.5% Pb) and 48 g/t Ag, including:4.0m of 19.8% Zn+Pb (11.4% Zn and 8.4% Pb) and 104 g/t AgProvides additional evidence that mineralizing system at Ballywire is gaining strength to northeast with the emergence of a relatively flat-lying zone of zinc-rich massive sulphide lenses located at the base of the Waulsortian Limestone and extending at least 360m along strike (open)Zone is pierced by today’s intercept, as well as the following three previously released holes:G11-3552-12: 29.6m of 10.6% Zn+Pb and 78 g/t Ag (Group Eleven’s best intercept to date; released 11-Jun-2024)G11-3552-13: 6.1m of 11.4% Zn+Pb and 85 g/t Ag (released 01-Aug-24) andG11-3552-17: several massive sulphide zones including 4.9m of 9.7% Zn+Pb and 39 g/t Ag; and 4.2m of 15% Zn+Pb and 34 g/t Ag (released 24-Sep-2024)Above mineralization is contained within a 2.6km long northeasterly trend of significantly mineralized drill intercepts, and within an overall 6km long prospective trend, also northeasterly, defined by four gravity-high anomalies along the Waulsortian LimestoneTwo-rig drill program at Ballywire continues on schedule with the next assay results expected over the coming few weeks

‘Our recent drilling at Ballywire has intersected continuous, flat-lying, zinc-rich massive sulphide lenses at the base of the Waulsortian limestone, an important development that further aligns the project with classic Irish-type zinc deposits,’ stated Bart Jaworski, CEO. ‘We have hit these massive sulphides over an open 360 metres of strike and mineralization appears to be widening, intensifying and getting shallower as we move northeast.’

‘Our immediate priority is to further delineate this new, flat-lying, massive sulphide zone, while we also aim to grow the broader 2.6km footprint of the discovery and follow up on silver and copper potential beneath the zinc and lead rich horizons. Our drill program continues with two rigs and further drill results will be released over the coming weeks as we continue to explore Ballywire’s 6km long prospective trend.’

Exhibit 1. Cross-Section A-A’ of G11-3552-18 (50m Step-Out NNW) at Ballywire

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5685/227382_227382_d123fe80b4faaa32_002full.jpg

Note: G11-3552-20 and -22 is completed with assay pending; 50m step-out refers to the distance from G11-3552-16

Exhibit 2. Plan Map Showing New Drilling (G11-3552-18) at Ballywire

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5685/227382_227382_d123fe80b4faaa32_003full.jpg

 

Recent Hole from 2024 Drill Campaign at Ballywire Discovery

The Ballywire prospect at the Company’s 100%-owned PG West Project in Republic of Ireland, is a new zinc-lead-silver discovery (first announced Sept-2022). In addition to 36 holes drilled and reported by Group Eleven to date, the most recent step-out hole (G11-3552-18) of the 2024 program is reported today (see Exhibits 1 to 6).

Exhibit 3. Summary of Assays from G11-3552-18 at Ballywire

ItemFrom
(m)To
(m)Int
(m)Zn
(%)Pb
(%)Zn+Pb
(%)Ag
(g/t)G11-3552-18226.90263.4536.554.811.586.3926.3Incl.226.90240.8213.923.970.854.8216.7Incl.226.90233.937.034.521.065.5816.1Incl.226.90231.684.784.741.306.0416.8And237.50240.823.326.170.816.9823.2And245.48263.4517.976.492.549.0340.0Incl.248.44263.4515.017.172.9510.1245.4Incl.247.75259.5411.798.053.5211.5748.1Incl.255.59259.543.9511.428.3619.78103.6Incl.257.50259.261.7615.6414.7230.36184.4

 

Note: True width of the overall mineralized package above is estimated at approx. 90-100% of the intersected interval

High-grade mineralization from G11-3552-18 consists predominantly of massive and semi-massive sulphide (sphalerite, galena, pyrite, chalcopyrite and suspected tennantite-tetrahedrite), as well as, disseminated and vein hosted sulphide mineralization. Mineralization occurs along and/or close to the base of the Waulsortian Limestone (see Exhibit 1).

Overall, recent drilling suggests the emergence of two distinct styles of mineralization. First, relatively flat-lying zinc-rich massive sulphide lenses and second, ‘other mineralization’, predominantly observed over the last two years and dominated by variably dipping massive sulphides, as well as, vein-hosted and disseminated mineralization (see Exhibit 2). Both styles occur at or near the base of the Waulsortian Limestone and offer great exploration opportunities as drilling progresses.

Exhibit 4. Emerging Massive Sulphide Zone and Upcoming Drill Results at Ballywire

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5685/227382_227382_d123fe80b4faaa32_004full.jpg

 

Looking forward, five drill holes (G11-3552-19 to -23; see Exhibit 4) have recently been completed with assay results expected over the coming weeks. Additionally, two other holes (-24 and -25) are in-progress, located northeast of G11-3552-18 and northeast of G11-3552-19, respectively. Exhibit 4 shows drilling to date across 1.25km of the overall 2.6km long trend (see Exhibit 2) of significantly mineralized drill intercepts (open in all directions).

Exhibit 5. Regional Gravity Map of Ballywire Area Showing 6km Long Prospective Trend

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5685/227382_227382_d123fe80b4faaa32_005full.jpg

Notes to Exhibit 6: (a) Pallas Green MRE is owned by Glencore (see Glencore’s Resources and Reserves Report dated December 31, 2023); (b) Stonepark MRE: see the ‘NI 43-101 Independent Report on the Zinc-Lead Exploration Project at Stonepark, County Limerick, Ireland’, by Gordon, Kelly and van Lente, with an effective date of April 26, 2018, as found on SEDAR; and (c) the historic estimate at Denison was reported by Westland Exploration Limited in ‘Report on Prospecting Licence 464’ by Dermot Hughes dated May, 1988; the historic estimate at Gortdrum was reported in ‘The Geology and Genesis of the Gortdrum Cu-Ag-Hg Orebody’ by G.M. Steed dated 1986; and the historic estimate at Tullacondra was first reported by Munster Base Metals Ltd in ‘Report on Mallow Property’ by David Wilbur, dated December 1973; and later summarized in ‘Cu-Ag Mineralization at Tullacondra, Mallow, Co. Cork’ by Wilbur and Carter in 1986; the above three historic estimates have not been verified as current mineral resources; none of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to prepare the historic estimates were reported and no resource categories were used; significant data compilation, re-drilling and data verification may be required by a Qualified Person before the historic estimates can be verified and upgraded to be compliant with current NI 43-101 standards; a Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify them as a current mineral resource and the Company is not treating the historic estimates as current mineral resources. ‘Rathdowney Trend’ is the south-westerly projection of the Rathdowney Trend, hosting the historic Lisheen and Galmoy mines.

Exhibit 6. Regional Map of PG West (100% Interest) and Stonepark (76.56% Interest)

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5685/227382_227382_d123fe80b4faaa32_006full.jpg

 

Third Party Agreement

Qualified Person

Technical information in this news release has been approved by Professor Garth Earls, Eur Geol, P.Geo, FSEG, geological consultant at IGS (International Geoscience Services) Limited, and independent ‘Qualified Person’ as defined under Canadian National Instrument 43-101.

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Information

Group Eleven inserts certified reference materials (‘CRMs’ or ‘Standards’) as well as blank material, to its sample stream as part of its industry-standard QA/QC programme. The QC results have been reviewed by the Qualified Person, who is satisfied that all the results are within acceptable parameters. The Qualified Person has validated the sampling and chain of custody protocols used by Group Eleven.

About Group Eleven Resources

Group Eleven Resources Corp. (TSX.V: ZNG; OTCBB: GRLVF and FRA: 3GE) is a mineral exploration company focused on advanced stage zinc exploration in the Republic of Ireland. Group Eleven announced the Ballywire discovery in September 2022. Key intercepts to date include:

10.8m of 10.0% Zn+Pb and 109 g/t Ag (G11-468-03)10.1m of 8.6% Zn+Pb and 46 g/t Ag (G11-468-06)10.5m of 14.7% Zn+Pb, 399 g/t Ag and 0.31% Cu (G11-468-12)11.2m of 8.9% Zn+Pb and 83 g/t Ag (G11-3552-03) 29.6m of 10.6% Zn+Pb, 78 g/t Ag and 0.15% Cu (G11-3552-12) and6.1m of 11.4% Zn+Pb, 85 g/t Ag (G11-3552-13)5.6m of 13.1% Zn+Pb, 116 g/t Ag (G11-3552-17)11.8m of 11.6% Zn+Pb, 48 g/t Ag (G11-3552-18)

The Company’s two largest shareholders are Glencore Canada Corp. (17.6% interest) and Michael Gentile (17.0%). Additional information about the Company is available at www.groupelevenresources.com.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Bart Jaworski, P.Geo.
Chief Executive Officer

E: b.jaworski@groupelevenresources.com | T: +353-85-833-2463
E: j.webb@groupelevenresources.com | T: 604-644-9514

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Such statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the future results of operations, performance and achievements of the Company, including the timing, content, cost and results of proposed work programs, the discovery and delineation of mineral deposits/resources/ reserves and geological interpretations. Although the Company believes that such statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, postulate and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements by the Company are not guarantees of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that may be located. All of the Company’s public disclosure filings may be accessed via www.sedarplus.ca and readers are urged to review these materials, including the technical reports filed with respect to the Company’s mineral properties.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/227382

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Editor’s note: This story contains details of suicide and violence that some readers may find upsetting.

Meir Golan sank his face in the dense, dark orange soil. He seemed desperate to stay close to his daughter for as long as possible, holding tight onto Shirel’s shroud as she was being buried.

More than a year after Hamas and other armed groups launched their terror attack against Israel, Shirel Golan became their latest victim. She died by suicide on Sunday, the day she turned 22, after a year-long struggle with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Once a happy woman who wouldn’t hesitate to drive for an hour to visit her family when they needed help, Shirel became quiet, slowly fading away after surviving the massacre.

“She didn’t come out from the house. She didn’t come to visit us, she was withdrawn,” he said.

Eyal said Shirel’s parents, four siblings and other relatives had worried about her health and tried to keep an eye on her as much as they could. She was rarely left on her own, he said.

But as the family gathered to celebrate her birthday on Sunday, Shirel wandered off without anyone noticing, according to Eyal. By the time her boyfriend found her at the bottom of the family garden, she was gone.

Heartbroken and overwhelmed with guilt and anger, Eyal said he blames the Israeli health authorities for some of Shirel’s problems. He said no one from the government ever reached out to her or the family.

“They had the list of all the Nova visitors, and they knew (who) is dead, and (who) survived. If someone survived, let’s help them,” he said.

Instead, he said, the authorities only offered help to those who actively sought it. People who didn’t reach out – like Shirel – were left to their own devices.

Information about the program that is available on the government’s official website for survivors appears to confirm the Golan family’s point that help is available but only upon request.

Eyal said he was trying to convince Shirel to get help because he has a firsthand experience with PTSD after serving as a reservist with Israel Defense Forces (IDF) during the 2021 flare-up in violence between Israel and Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

“I told her to talk to anyone, from our dad and mom, to a stranger in the street, talk to someone, please,” he said. “You don’t love to go to shrinks and psychiatrists, okay, go to visit your friends that also went the Nova Festival and survived. You can talk about it. You can overcome it,” he said he told her.

But he said Shirel refused.

It wasn’t until Eyal found the policeman who rescued Shirel from the Nova Festival site and reconnected the two of them that she began to open up.

‘They won’t help me’

The Nova Music Festival massacre was by far the deadliest of all the attacks of October 7, with nearly a third of the 1,200 people who died that day killed there.

There were so many dead and kidnapped that it took Israeli authorities months to determine the exact number of victims at the site. The IDF said 347 people, most of them young, were killed and some 40 others were taken hostage from the festival.

Many of the hundreds who survived are still struggling with mental health problems, including with PTSD, survivor’s guilt, depression, and anxiety.

But it’s not just the survivors themselves. Their families and friends and other people exposed to the secondhand violence are also having problems, Eyal said.

“Since October 7, we are a country in PTSD, every single one of us,” he said.

The Israeli government has established a public mental health assistance program almost immediately after the attacks, offering free therapy to anyone who needed it.

Survivors struggling with PTSD can get up to 36 appointments though the program, with anyone else eligible for up to 12 sessions.

According to a report by the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, nearly 1,900 of the roughly 3,000 survivors of the attacks have been referred for treatment as of July. More than 200 completed at least 24 sessions.

But the program is only available to those who request it. Shirel didn’t and nobody reached out to her offering it, according to her brother.

Some of the survivors have criticized the program as overly bureaucratic and not fit for purpose.

“I have had 36 hours of treatment, and I continue to pay for the psychologist I see by myself because of the bureaucracy of getting a compensation for the treatment,” Omer Leshem, a survivor of the Nova Festival attack, told a hearing in the Knesset in July.

How to get help

Help is available if you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or mental health matters.
In the US: Call or text 988, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.
Globally: The International Association for Suicide Prevention and Befrienders Worldwide have contact information for crisis centers around the world.

    “We were at the event, and no one was there to help us. And even now, they won’t help me,” he said.

    Eyal Golan said the only help Shirel received was from the local authorities, which are strapped for cash and unable to offer adequate assistance.

    “Only the municipal system helped her, but they have limited resources. They cannot pay for a lot of therapies,” he said. “The number of (sessions) is very limited, the variety of it is very limited.”

    Unable to help his sister, Eyal said he has now made it his mission to raise awareness and try to convince anyone struggling with the same issues as Shirel to seek help.

    “I hope that if I can share her story (with) the world, every person who suffers from PTSD will know that they are not alone,” he said.

    This post appeared first on cnn.com